Yet it seems incautious and even disconnected from this moment to plunge ahead with another 3 million square feet (give or take) of corporate space when all the evidence points toward that market’s shrinking rather than growing. We were probably going to get an office tower on the site no matter what. (One could perhaps solve that by making it a twin-towered building akin to Time Warner Center - a double supertall, in effect, for the double-super-rich.) As my colleague Justin Davidson reported in this great story last year, chunky towers with big floors tend not to be great for apartments because nobody wants to live in the inner regions without windows. (Across the plaza, 5 World Trade will be residential with a modest amount of non-luxury housing, though it should have more.) If that option were on the table - which it may not be, owing to Port Authority restrictions and/or the economics of the site - it would be a quite different-looking structure. (Historically, the preponderance of New York skyscrapers that stick in the mind architecturally have show-offy tops - Chrysler, Empire State, Citicorp, AT&T - and this one, like its once-scorned predecessor at 2 World Trade, does not.) Or, if we’re thinking entirely outside the (glass) box, it could have been a tower of apartments, which are in far shorter supply than Class A office space. At least the bees on Goldman Sachs’s roof can stop by and pollinate.īut “not bad” on a scale like this brings up a second thought: What might be better? Terraces aside, it’s not a highly distinctive, memorable building, and that feels like a blown opportunity. You do wonder about the maintenance required to keep trees in decent shape on the 70th floor. We’ve seen these greenery-accented plans in other cities’ residential buildings (where they are not always delightful bugs are a problem), and Ingels likes them as well: His office tower near the High Line, another stop-and-start project, treats a little outdoor lunchtime space as an amenity for the desk drones. More distinctive are the tower’s little scooped-out terraces cut into its bulk and planted with trees. Chromium-steel banding between the ashlars does a lot to disguise the blockiness of the Empire State Building, for example. So it’s mostly just a good old optical trick, striping a tower vertically to emphasize its height. Virtually every big office building now wears the same outfit, and given that the rest of the complex is already up or on its way, you could even argue that 900 feet of disco paneling is “contextual.” The form seems structurally innovative at first glance - bands running up the exterior imply that it’s made of several independent square tubes, like the Willis (formerly Sears) Tower in Chicago, but apparently those lines are more ornamental than expressive. Yes, it’s one more squared-off tall box wrapped in a mirrored curtain wall, which was probably inevitable. His revamp of the revamp is the one released yesterday.Īnd it’s not bad. BIG’s design would have required significant modifications to the foundation that had already been poured, which may be one reason why, late in 2020, the job went back to Foster. A couple of media companies, including News Corporation, expressed interest, then decided not to move in. A few years later, Foster’s design was set aside, and another celebrity architect’s firm produced a slightly more avant-garde replacement: a stairstep tower by Bjarke Ingels Group that seemed to edge up to its neighbor at 1 World Trade. There was talk of fitting it out as a low-rise stump. Construction began, then stalled after the 2008 market crash. The architecture firm Foster + Partners and the developer Larry Silverstein unveiled a design in 2006 with a distinctive chamfered four-of-diamonds top. Even by the standards of this generation-long rebuilding effort, Tower 2 has had a lengthy stop-start history. New York YIMBY has fresh renderings of 2 World Trade Center, the last of the six skyscrapers that will surround the 9/11 memorial downtown.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |